Answer

Yes — this can violate the right to privacy protected by Article 26 of the Civil Code. In Spouses Hing v. Choachuy (G.R. No. 179736), the Supreme Court held that installing CCTV cameras aimed at a neighbor's property, capturing activities in an area where the neighbor has a reasonable expectation of privacy, is an actionable intrusion into privacy for which damages and injunctive relief may be sought.

The right is not absolute — it protects against unreasonable intrusion into an area where a person has a reasonable expectation of privacy. Ordinary security cameras that cover one's own premises are generally permissible; the wrong lies in aiming them to pry into a neighbor's private space.

Researching Philippine law? Intellegal brings Philippine case-law search, statute and issuance exploration, multi-dimension case comparison, document visualization, and cited deep-research reports into a single workflow — with every citation traced back to its original source, so you can verify each answer rather than take it on trust. Every authority it surfaces links back to its original provision or decision, so you can open the source and confirm the wording yourself, and save or export the questions and reports you reference most. See the full report for the statutes and cases behind this answer, or explore the related questions below.

Sources & further reading

Cases on this topic

Philippine Supreme Court decisions that apply the rules above.

Related questions

Read the full report →
Research aid — not legal advice. Verify the current text against the Official Gazette. Provisions may have been amended or repealed. Using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer.