Answer
Self-defense is one of the justifying circumstances under Article 11 of the Revised Penal Code. The Supreme Court has consistently held that it has three requisites: (1) unlawful aggression on the part of the victim; (2) reasonable necessity of the means employed to prevent or repel the aggression; and (3) lack of sufficient provocation on the part of the person defending himself.
Unlawful aggression is the indispensable requirement — without an actual or imminent unlawful attack on the accused's life or safety, there is nothing to repel and self-defense cannot be appreciated at all. Because self-defense is a justifying circumstance, an accused who invokes it admits the killing or injury but is held not criminally liable; the burden then shifts to him to prove the three requisites by clear and convincing evidence.
Researching Philippine law? Intellegal brings Philippine case-law search, statute and issuance exploration, multi-dimension case comparison, document visualization, and cited deep-research reports into a single workflow — with every citation traced back to its original source, so you can verify each answer rather than take it on trust. Every authority it surfaces links back to its original provision or decision, so you can open the source and confirm the wording yourself, and save or export the questions and reports you reference most. See the full report for the statutes and cases behind this answer, or explore the related questions below.