Answer

Under Article 1673 of the Civil Code, the lessor may judicially eject the lessee for: (1) the expiration of the agreed or statutory period of the lease; (2) lack of payment of the stipulated rent; (3) violation of any of the conditions agreed upon; and (4) devoting the thing leased to a use not stipulated which causes its deterioration, or otherwise failing to observe the required diligence.

For residential units covered by the Rent Control Act (Republic Act No. 9653), the grounds for judicial ejectment are further regulated — for example, subleasing without the owner's written consent, rental arrears of at least three months, the owner's legitimate need to repossess the unit for his own use, or the need to make necessary repairs. Ejectment itself is pursued through a summary action — forcible entry or unlawful detainer — in the first-level court.

Researching Philippine law? Intellegal brings Philippine case-law search, statute and issuance exploration, multi-dimension case comparison, document visualization, and cited deep-research reports into a single workflow — with every citation traced back to its original source, so you can verify each answer rather than take it on trust. Every authority it surfaces links back to its original provision or decision, so you can open the source and confirm the wording yourself, and save or export the questions and reports you reference most. See the full report for the statutes and cases behind this answer, or explore the related questions below.

Sources & further reading

Cases on this topic

Philippine Supreme Court decisions that apply the rules above.

Related questions

Read the full report →
Research aid — not legal advice. Verify the current text against the Official Gazette. Provisions may have been amended or repealed. Using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer.