Answer

The benefit of excussion (also called the benefit of exhaustion) is the guarantor's right not to be compelled to pay the creditor until all the property of the debtor has been exhausted and the creditor has resorted to all the legal remedies against the debtor (Civil Code Article 2058). It reflects the subsidiary character of a guaranty.

The benefit does not arise, however, in the situations listed in Article 2059 — among them, where the guarantor has expressly renounced it, where he has bound himself solidarily with the debtor (that is, as a surety), or where the debtor is insolvent. A surety, being solidarily liable, cannot invoke excussion at all.

Researching Philippine law? Intellegal brings Philippine case-law search, statute and issuance exploration, multi-dimension case comparison, document visualization, and cited deep-research reports into a single workflow — with every citation traced back to its original source, so you can verify each answer rather than take it on trust. Every authority it surfaces links back to its original provision or decision, so you can open the source and confirm the wording yourself, and save or export the questions and reports you reference most. See the full report for the statutes and cases behind this answer, or explore the related questions below.

Sources & further reading

Cases on this topic

Philippine Supreme Court decisions that apply the rules above.

Related questions

Read the full report →
Research aid — not legal advice. Verify the current text against the Official Gazette. Provisions may have been amended or repealed. Using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer.