Ask your own question →
This page answers the general question. Deep Synthesis answers yours, with citations.

Answer

Unjust enrichment, under Article 22 of the Civil Code, means that a person who acquires or comes into possession of something at the expense of another, without just or legal ground, must return it. It rests on the maxim that no one may unjustly enrich himself at the expense of another. The action to recover on this basis is called accion in rem verso.

Accion in rem verso is a subsidiary remedy — it is available only when the plaintiff has no other action based on contract, quasi-contract, crime, or quasi-delict, so it does not apply when a valid contract already governs the parties. Its core requisites are that the defendant was enriched, that the plaintiff suffered a corresponding loss, and that there was no just or legal ground for the enrichment.

Sources & further reading

Cases on this topic

Related questions

Ask your own question →
This page answers the general question. Deep Synthesis answers yours, with citations.
Read the full report →
Research aid — not legal advice. Verify the current text against the Official Gazette. Provisions may have been amended or repealed. Using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer.