Ask your own question →
This page answers the general question. Deep Synthesis answers yours, with citations.

Answer

Under Article 2180 of the Civil Code, responsibility for a quasi-delict may be demanded not only from the person who caused the damage but also from those responsible for him: parents for the damage caused by their minor children who live in their company; guardians for their wards; employers for the damage caused by their employees acting within the scope of their assigned tasks; and owners and managers of establishments for their employees. This liability is direct and primary, not merely subsidiary.

The person made vicariously liable may escape liability by proving that he observed the diligence of a good father of a family to prevent the damage. This requires concrete proof of due care both in the selection (culpa in eligiendo) and in the supervision (culpa in vigilando) of the person who caused the harm — bare allegations of diligence are not enough.

Sources & further reading

Cases on this topic

Related questions

Ask your own question →
This page answers the general question. Deep Synthesis answers yours, with citations.
Read the full report →
Research aid — not legal advice. Verify the current text against the Official Gazette. Provisions may have been amended or repealed. Using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer.