Anyone who works with Philippine documents knows this file. It's a PDF, so it opens fine — but try to select a sentence and nothing highlights. It's a scan of a signed original, or a scan of a photocopy, or a document printed and re-scanned so many times the letters have gone soft at the edges. Every word is visible. None of it is text.

Until now, that file stopped you at the door. You retyped what you needed, or you pushed it through something else first, and only then did the actual work begin.

Contract Review and Visual Digest now read scanned PDFs directly. Upload the file as it reached you — the tools read the document and carry on exactly as they would with a Word file.

A scanned signed lease contract — a grey-cast page image of a printed agreement, the kind of PDF whose text cannot be selected
The file going in. A scan of a signed lease — page image, not text. This is the document; what follows is what came back from it.

What changed, in practical terms

That last point is worth underlining, because it's the one people assume they'll lose: the review isn't a shallower "best effort" because the file was harder to read. It reads the contract and analyses it the same way.

Contract Review output produced from the scanned lease — a validity check, counts of Must Fix, Should Fix, Optional and Missing items, an executive summary, and the itemised findings
What came back from that scan. Not merely a readable transcription — a review. It flagged the rental and deposit amounts left blank, an unlawful self-help repossession clause, the omission of the lessor's statutory obligations, and missing force-majeure and dispute-resolution provisions.

One thing that is not yet on par

The downloadable DOCX redline. Contract Review can still generate the tracked-changes file from a scanned source, but — while Contract Review is in Beta — the redline you get from a scan is not yet as clean as the one you get from a native DOCX or TXT. The analysis on screen is unaffected; it's the exported Word file that's still catching up.

So if the redline is the artefact you actually need — because you're sending marked-up changes to the other side — upload the native file when you have one, and use the scan when you don't. We'd rather tell you that now than have you find it in the export.

The same holds in Visual Digest

A scanned agreement opened in Visual Digest still becomes the structured views — including the contract-specific ones, like the symmetry between what each side gets and what each side owes.

Visual Digest Contract Symmetry Diagram — the lessor's and lessee's rights, obligations and restrictions set side by side, each flagged standard or caution
Contract Symmetry. Each party's rights, obligations and restrictions set against the other's, clause by clause — from the same scanned file.

What it needs from you

One honest caveat, because it's better to hear it from us than to discover it on a deadline: the scan has to be reasonably clear. A clean scan is ideal. A faint fax-quality copy, a very dark page, or a badly skewed one is not going to give you a reliable read — and with a legal document, a partly-guessed read is worse than none.

The practical test is simple: if you can comfortably read it on your own screen, the tools can work with it. If you're squinting, get a better scan.

Still to come

This release covers scanned PDFs. Standalone image files — a photo taken on a phone, a screenshot — aren't accepted yet. If that's the shape your documents usually arrive in, it's on the list; for now, scan to PDF first.

Why this matters more here than elsewhere

In Philippine practice the authoritative copy is very often the paper one. Signed originals get scanned. Older decisions circulate as scans of scans. A legal tool that only accepts clean, text-native files quietly excludes a large share of the documents actually in front of you.

Closing that gap is less glamorous than a new feature — and it probably saves more time than one.

As always, you can check it

Everything the tools return still points back to the source. A review still shows the legal basis behind each finding; a digest still opens onto the document's own text; and both still carry the reminder that AI-assisted output is for reference and should be verified against the official document. Reading a harder file changes what goes in — it doesn't change your ability to check what comes out.

Try it on the file that's been sitting in your inbox.

Contract Review  ·  Visual Digest

Intellegal is a legal research and review assistant developed by Technese Legaltech Inc. (Makati). It supports legal work and does not provide legal advice; verify all outputs against the primary sources it cites. The sample document shown is a blank template used for demonstration.