Petitioner
State Investment House
Respondent
Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 106795
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Gonzaga-Reyes, J.
Decided
November 16, 1999

Summary

State Investment House, Inc. (SIHI) sought to substitute its assignee Fil-Nippon as plaintiff in a mortgage foreclosure case against Cheng Ban Yek Co., Inc. Allied Banking Corporation opposed, citing its P50 million counterclaim against SIHI for alleged mismanagement while controlling CBY. The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals ruling that substitution was improper. The Court held that Allied's permissive counterclaim for damages from SIHI's personal acts of mismanagement was independent of the foreclosure action and could not be pursued against assignee Fil-Nippon without Allied's consent. Under Article 1293 of the Civil Code, substitution of debtor requires creditor's consent. SIHI must remain as party to defend the counterclaim as the real party-in-interest, with Fil-Nippon joining as co-plaintiff. The decision establishes that assignment of rights does not automatically discharge the assignor from independent counterclaims arising from personal acts.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · November 16, 1999

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.