- Petitioner
- Purita Salvatierra
- Respondent
- The Honorable Court of Appeals
- Citation
- G.R. No. 107797
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- First Division
- Ponente
- Hermosisima, Jr., J.
- Decided
- August 26, 1996
Summary
This case involved a property dispute over a 149 sq. m. portion of Lot No. 26 originally owned by the estate of Enrique Salvatierra. Through an extrajudicial partition in 1968, Anselmo Salvatierra was allocated only 405 sq. m. of the 749 sq. m. lot, while Venancio Salvatierra received the remainder. Venancio subsequently sold 149 sq. m. to the Longalong spouses in 1970. However, in 1980, Anselmo fraudulently registered the entire lot under his name despite knowing his limited entitlement. The Supreme Court affirmed that this created an implied trust under Art. 1456 of the Civil Code, requiring reconveyance to the rightful owners. The Court clarified that actions for reconveyance based on implied trust prescribe in 10 years under Art. 1144, not 4 years under Art. 1391, as the obligation arises from law rather than contract annulment. The case demonstrates the distinction between voidable contracts and fraudulent property acquisitions, establishing important precedent for prescription periods in reconveyance actions.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
Denied the petition, holding that a party's bad-faith registration of land he knew he did not fully own created an implied trust under Article 1456, and that an action for reconveyance on such a trust prescribes in ten years under Article 1144 — not the four-year period of Article 1391 — because the obligation arises by law, not from a voidable contract.
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.