Petitioner
Producers Bank of the Philippines (Now First International Bank)
Respondent
Hon. Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 115324
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Decided
February 19, 2003

Summary

This case involves a bank's liability for unauthorized withdrawals facilitated by employee connivance. Franklin Vives accommodated Col. Doronilla by depositing P200,000 in Sterela Marketing's account for incorporation purposes under a commodatum arrangement. Bank Assistant Manager Atienza, knowing the money belonged to Vives, improperly allowed Doronilla to withdraw funds without required authorization or passbook presentation. The Supreme Court upheld lower court decisions finding the bank solidarily liable under Article 2180 of the Civil Code for its employee's wrongful acts committed within the scope of employment. The Court distinguished between commodatum and mutuum contracts, ruling this was an accommodation loan where ownership remained with Vives. The decision establishes important precedent on banking liability for employee misconduct and proper classification of loan agreements in Philippine jurisprudence.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · February 19, 2003

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.