Petitioner
National Power Corporation
Respondent
Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 122195
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Mendoza, J.
Decided
July 23, 1998

Summary

Dennis Coo purchased aluminum scrap wires which were later seized by PC and taken by NPC despite his acquittal in a related criminal case. Coo filed a replevin action to recover the property. The Supreme Court affirmed lower courts' rulings that Coo had proven his entitlement to possession through documentary evidence (sales invoice and way bill) while NPC's claims about property discrepancies were unsupported. The Court emphasized that replevin requires only proof of entitlement to legal possession, not ownership. NPC was held liable for nominal damages for violating Coo's property rights and attorney's fees for acting in bad faith by refusing to return the property after Coo's criminal acquittal. The decision reinforces the principle that preponderance of evidence governs civil cases and that wrongful detention of personal property entitles the rightful possessor to civil remedies.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · July 23, 1998

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.