Petitioner
Investors Finance Corporation
Respondent
Autoworld Sales Corporation
Citation
G.R. No. 128990
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Bellosillo, J.
Decided
September 21, 2000

Summary

The Supreme Court affirmed that a financing company's Installment Paper Purchase transaction was a disguised usurious loan scheme. FNCB Finance created three interconnected contracts to circumvent Usury Law interest rate ceilings: a sale of land from Pio Barretto to Autoworld, assignment of receivables to FNCB, and mortgage security. Key evidence included FNCB drafting all contracts, requiring proceeds be 'flowed back' to borrower, FNCB's own designation of funds as 'loan proceeds,' and subsequent direct lending at 28% after ceiling removal. The Court applied Civil Code Article 1957 voiding contracts intended to circumvent usury laws, ordering reimbursement of the entire usurious interest paid (P3,921,217.78) rather than just the excess over legal rates, establishing that borrowers in usurious transactions may recover the whole interest paid regardless of pari delicto principles.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · September 21, 2000

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.