Petitioner
Heirs of Gaudencio Blancaflor
Respondent
Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 130380
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Per Ramirez, P., J.
Decided
March 17, 1999

Summary

This case involves a property dispute arising from an execution sale. In 1968, Gaudencio Blancaflor lost a civil case and his property was sold at execution to satisfy the judgment. The purchaser, Sarmiento Trading Corporation, obtained proper certificates and court orders transferring title. However, Blancaflor retained the owner's duplicate certificate. Twenty years later, the current owner (Greater Manila Equipment Marketing Corporation) filed a petition to compel surrender of the duplicate certificate. The heirs argued the action had prescribed under Article 1144 of the Civil Code. The Supreme Court ruled that this was not enforcement of the original judgment but administrative completion of an already executed sale. Since proper inscriptions provided constructive notice and the redemption period had expired without redemption, the original owner was divested of all rights. The petition was properly filed under Section 107 of P.D. 1529, and prescription did not apply to such administrative proceedings.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · March 17, 1999

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.