Petitioner
Evelyn Panahon
Respondent
People
Citation
G.R. No. 134342
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Garcia, J.
Decided
August 11, 2005

Criminal prosecution for estafa under Article 315, paragraph 2(a) of the Revised Penal Code involving fraudulent taking of money through false…

Summary

This criminal case involves Evelyn Panahon's conviction for estafa under Article 315, paragraph 2(a) of the Revised Penal Code. Panahon obtained P21,163.25 from Susan Jocson, her townmate and neighbor, under the false pretense of buying ready-to-wear clothes abroad for their business. However, she never left the country and disappeared with the money. The Regional Trial Court convicted her based solely on Jocson's testimony, which was affirmed by the Court of Appeals and ultimately by the Supreme Court. The Supreme Court emphasized that the testimony of a single credible witness is sufficient for conviction beyond reasonable doubt, particularly given the relationship between the parties and absence of ill motive. The Court confirmed the proper application of the Indeterminate Sentence Law in imposing the penalty.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

Common questions

Plain-language Q&A on the issues in this case.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · August 11, 2005

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.