Petitioner
Sps. Cesar A. Larrobis, Jr.
Respondent
Philippine Veterans Bank
Citation
G.R. No. 135706
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Austria-Martinez, J.
Decided
October 1, 2004

Summary

Spouses Larrobis borrowed P135,000 from Philippine Veterans Bank in 1980, secured by real estate mortgage due in 1981. When the bank faced financial difficulties and was placed under receivership from 1985-1992, it failed to foreclose within the 10-year prescriptive period. The bank eventually foreclosed in 1995, fourteen years after the loan matured. The RTC upheld the foreclosure, ruling that receivership constituted a fortuitous event interrupting prescription. The Supreme Court reversed, holding that bank receivership does not interrupt the prescriptive period since receivers are legally obligated to foreclose mortgages under the Central Bank Act. The Court also ruled that a 1985 demand letter for insurance premiums could not interrupt prescription as it pertained to obligations outside the original mortgage contract. The foreclosure was declared null and void.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 1, 2004

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.