Petitioner
Angel Clemeno, Jr.
Respondent
Romeo R. Lobregat
Citation
G.R. No. 137845
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Austria-Martinez, J.
Decided
September 9, 2004

Summary

This case involves a dispute over a verbal real estate sale agreement between relatives. Respondent Lobregat claimed he entered a contract of sale with petitioner Clemeno for property worth P270,000, made substantial payments totaling P113,049.96, and demanded specific performance. Petitioners argued it was merely a lease-purchase agreement and sought to eject respondent. The Supreme Court ruled it was an enforceable contract of sale despite being oral, as it was partially performed through possession transfer and payments. The Court distinguished between contracts of sale and contracts to sell, finding ownership had transferred upon delivery. The decision emphasized that the Statute of Frauds does not apply to partially executed contracts, and petitioners could not unilaterally change the agreed purchase price.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · September 9, 2004

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.