Petitioner
Biñan Steel Corporation
Respondent
Hon. Court of Appeals
Citation
G.R. No. 142013
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Corona, J.
Decided
October 15, 2002

Summary

BSC obtained preliminary attachment on property owned by spouses Ng in collection case, with attachment registered July 27, 1998. Garcias purchased same property June 29, 1998 but registered sale only August 12, 1998. Supreme Court ruled BSC has superior rights because attachment creates proceeding in rem enforceable against whole world, and registered attachment takes priority over subsequently registered sale. Court applied Civil Code Article 1544 on double sales and principle of constructive notice through registration. Garcias were found guilty of forum-shopping for pursuing same relief in different courts simultaneously. Decision affirms that purchasers of attached property take subject to attachment creditor's rights, emphasizing importance of checking public records before property purchase.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 15, 2002

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.