- Petitioner
- Biñan Steel Corporation
- Respondent
- Hon. Court of Appeals
- Citation
- G.R. No. 142013
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- Third Division
- Ponente
- Corona, J.
- Decided
- October 15, 2002
Summary
BSC obtained preliminary attachment on property owned by spouses Ng in collection case, with attachment registered July 27, 1998. Garcias purchased same property June 29, 1998 but registered sale only August 12, 1998. Supreme Court ruled BSC has superior rights because attachment creates proceeding in rem enforceable against whole world, and registered attachment takes priority over subsequently registered sale. Court applied Civil Code Article 1544 on double sales and principle of constructive notice through registration. Garcias were found guilty of forum-shopping for pursuing same relief in different courts simultaneously. Decision affirms that purchasers of attached property take subject to attachment creditor's rights, emphasizing importance of checking public records before property purchase.