Petitioner
United Coconut Planters Bank
Respondent
Ruben E. Basco
Citation
G.R. No. 142668
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Callejo, Sr., J.
Decided
August 31, 2004

Summary

This case involves the conflict between a bank's property rights and an individual's rights as stockholder and depositor. Ruben Basco, a terminated UCPB employee who owned bank shares and maintained an account, was barred from all bank premises by a blanket memorandum while he worked as insurance agent needing access to solicit policies from bank employees. The Supreme Court recognized banks' right to impose reasonable access limitations for security but found the absolute ban overly broad and violative of stockholder/depositor rights. However, regarding a specific incident where security guards prevented Basco from entering a restricted working area, the Court ruled the guards acted properly within their authority. The decision balances property rights with individual rights, emphasizing that banks may exclude individuals but not arbitrarily or in violation of legitimate customer relationships. All damage claims were ultimately dismissed.

Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding

A bank may exclude persons from its premises and impose reasonable security limitations under Article 429, but a memorandum barring a stockholder-depositor from all premises under all circumstances is overly broad and violates his rights.

An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Cases citing this case

Cases in our corpus that cite this decision.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 31, 2004

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.