Petitioner
California Bus Lines
Respondent
State Investment House
Citation
G.R. No. 147950
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Quisumbing, J.
Decided
December 11, 2003

Summary

California Bus Lines purchased buses from Delta Motors on installment via promissory notes. After payment defaults, a restructuring agreement modified terms. Delta later assigned 5 promissory notes to State Investment House as security for Delta's separate obligations. When SIHI sought collection, CBLI claimed the notes were novated by restructuring and discharged by a later compromise agreement with Delta. The Supreme Court ruled that restructuring agreements that merely modify payment terms without creating incompatibility do not constitute novation. The compromise agreement could not bind SIHI since it wasn't a party and Delta lacked authority to compromise assigned obligations. SIHI's right to collect remained valid and enforceable against CBLI.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · December 11, 2003

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.