Petitioner
Bpi Family Savings Bank
Respondent
Romeo Manikan
Citation
G.R. No. 148789
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Vitug, J.
Decided
January 16, 2003

Summary

BPI Family Savings Bank issued manager's checks totaling nearly P1 million to pay 1992-1993 business taxes to Iloilo City. The checks were delivered through unauthorized intermediaries and misapplied to other taxpayers' accounts instead of the bank's liabilities. When the bank sued City Treasurer Romeo Manikan for mandamus to compel issuance of official receipts, the Supreme Court affirmed lower courts' dismissal, ruling that mandamus requires clear legal right and imperative duty, which were absent since the bank assumed risk by using unauthorized delivery channels. However, the Court deleted the P30,000 attorney's fees award, emphasizing that such awards require proper legal justification and litigation should not be penalized. The case establishes important principles about mandamus requirements and attorney's fees awards while highlighting banking institutions' duty of diligence in tax payments.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · January 16, 2003

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.