Filipinas Synthetic Fiber · G.R. 152033

Petitioner: Filipinas Synthetic Fiber Corporation
Respondent: Wilfredo de Los Santos
Citation: G.R. No. 152033
Court: Supreme Court
Division: Second Division
Ponente: Peralta, J.
Decided: March 16, 2011

Summary

This Supreme Court case involved a vehicular accident where a company shuttle bus collided with a private car, killing four persons including the spouses of two respondents. The families filed civil cases for damages against Filipinas Synthetic Fiber Corporation and its driver Alfredo Mejia. The RTC and CA found both defendants liable, with the SC affirming the decisions. Key issues included the driver's negligence due to excessive speed (70 km/h vs. 50 km/h legal limit), the company's vicarious liability under Article 2180 of the Civil Code, and the failure to establish the due diligence defense in employee selection and supervision. The SC upheld the liability but reduced moral damages from P100,000 to P50,000 per case, emphasizing that employers must provide concrete proof of diligence to avoid vicarious liability for employee negligence.

Statutes applied

Civil Code, Art. 2180

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Bataclan v. Medina G.R. No. L-10126
Africa v. Caltex (Phil.), Inc. G.R. No. L-12986
Spouses Benjamin C. Mamaril v. The Boy Scout of the Philippines G.R. No. 179382
Spouses Fernando v. Continental Airlines G.R. No. 188288
Cornelio Lampesa v. Dr. Juan de Vera, Jr. G.R. No. 155111
Keihin-Everett Forwarding Co. v. Tokio Marine Malayan Insurance Co. G.R. No. 212107
National Transmission Corporation v. Leslie L. de Jesus G.R. No. 217928
Rcj Bus Lines v. Standard Insurance Company G.R. No. 193629

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · March 16, 2011

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.