Petitioner
Homeowners Savings & Loan Bank
Respondent
Miguela C. Dailo
Citation
G.R. No. 153802
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Tinga, J.
Decided
March 11, 2005

Summary

This case involves the validity of a real estate mortgage on conjugal property executed without the spouse's consent. Homeowners Savings & Loan Bank obtained a mortgage on property owned by spouses Dailo through a special power of attorney from the husband, without the wife's knowledge. After the husband's death and foreclosure, the wife sued for nullity of the mortgage. The Supreme Court affirmed lower courts' rulings that the mortgage was void under Article 124 of the Family Code, which requires both spouses' consent for disposition of conjugal property. The Court rejected the bank's argument that Article 493 of the Civil Code on co-ownership should apply, holding that conjugal partnerships are governed by Family Code provisions. The decision reinforces the protection of conjugal property rights and the requirement of spousal consent for encumbrances on marital property.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Other Philippine cases also address these provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · March 11, 2005

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.