Petitioner
Mr. Wee Sion Ben
Respondent
Semexco/Zest-O Marketing Corporation
Citation
G.R. No. 153898
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Sandoval-Gutierrez, J.
Decided
October 18, 2007

Summary

This case involves a contractual dispute over payment for fruit juices. Best Emporium violated the payment terms in the Charge Invoice by issuing a 'pay to cash' check instead of one payable to the corporation as required. The sales representative who received the check encashed it but did not remit payment to the company. When petitioners issued a replacement check, they stopped payment on it. The Supreme Court held that the contract term requiring specific payee designation was binding despite being a contract of adhesion. Under Article 1595(1) of the Civil Code, petitioners wrongfully refused to pay according to contract terms, so their obligation was not extinguished. The Court affirmed liability for the full amount plus interest and attorney's fees as contractually stipulated.

Statutes applied

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 18, 2007

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.