Petitioner
Republic of the Philippines
Respondent
Hon. Victorino Evangelista
Citation
G.R. No. 156015
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Puno, J.
Decided
August 11, 2005

Summary

The Supreme Court upheld the validity of an agency coupled with interest in a treasure hunting dispute. Dante Legaspi owned land where military officials conducted treasure hunting operations pursuant to an agreement with a third party. Legaspi's nephew Gutierrez, appointed as attorney-in-fact with 40% interest in any treasure found, sued for damages and injunction. When Legaspi attempted to revoke the agency, the Court ruled it irrevocable because it was coupled with interest - Gutierrez had financial stake in the treasure and had contracted with lawyers for services based on treasure shares. The Court affirmed the preliminary injunction protecting Legaspi's property rights and rejected claims of judicial bias. This case establishes important precedent on irrevocable agencies under Civil Code Art. 1927 and reinforces property owners' rights to seek injunctive relief against unauthorized activities on their land.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 11, 2005

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.