Petitioner
Spouses Victoriano Chung
Respondent
Ulanday Construction
Citation
G.R. No. 156038
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Brion, J.
Decided
October 11, 2010

Summary

This Supreme Court case involved a construction contract dispute between homeowner spouses and a construction company over a residential house project in Makati City. The contractor performed unauthorized change orders worth nearly P1 million without the required written approval, while the homeowners delayed progress billing payments. Both parties claimed contract breaches. The RTC and CA ruled differently on the application of Civil Code Article 1724 governing additional costs in construction contracts. The Supreme Court ultimately applied Article 1724 correctly, ruling that change orders require written owner approval and cannot be recovered through estoppel. The Court ordered a set-off between the homeowners' outstanding obligations (P575,922.13) and the contractor's liability for construction defects (P717,524.00), resulting in a net award of P141,601.87 to the homeowners. The decision reinforces the importance of strict compliance with contractual terms in construction agreements and proper application of Civil Code provisions on construction contracts.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 11, 2010

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.