- Petitioner
- Briones
- Respondent
- Miguel
- Citation
- G.R. No. 156343
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Decided
- October 18, 2004
Custody dispute over illegitimate child Michael Kevin Pineda between biological father and mother
Summary
Father filed habeas corpus petition seeking custody of illegitimate son after mother's family took child and refused to return him. The Supreme Court affirmed that under the Family Code, illegitimate children are under the sole parental authority of their mother, and fathers can only obtain custody if mothers default or are unfit. Despite father's demonstrated care and financial support, no compelling reason existed to deprive mother of custody. The Court granted father visitorial rights as a constitutionally protected parental right but corrected the lower court's erroneous application of a rule allowing children to choose parents, which applies only to married but separated couples. The decision reinforces the legal preference for maternal custody of illegitimate children while protecting paternal visitation rights.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
An illegitimate child is under the sole parental authority of the mother regardless of the father's recognition (Family Code Article 176); the father may assume custody only if the mother defaults, though he retains visitation rights.
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.