Petitioner
Briones
Respondent
Miguel
Citation
G.R. No. 156343
Court
Supreme Court
Decided
October 18, 2004

Custody dispute over illegitimate child Michael Kevin Pineda between biological father and mother

Summary

Father filed habeas corpus petition seeking custody of illegitimate son after mother's family took child and refused to return him. The Supreme Court affirmed that under the Family Code, illegitimate children are under the sole parental authority of their mother, and fathers can only obtain custody if mothers default or are unfit. Despite father's demonstrated care and financial support, no compelling reason existed to deprive mother of custody. The Court granted father visitorial rights as a constitutionally protected parental right but corrected the lower court's erroneous application of a rule allowing children to choose parents, which applies only to married but separated couples. The decision reinforces the legal preference for maternal custody of illegitimate children while protecting paternal visitation rights.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 18, 2004

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.