Petitioner
Sps. Alfredo Mendoza
Respondent
Maria Coronel
Citation
G.R. No. 156402
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Puno, J.
Decided
February 13, 2006

Summary

This case resolves the issue of whether a co-owner can file an ejectment suit without impleading other co-owners. The Supreme Court affirmed that under Article 487 of the Civil Code, any co-owner may bring an ejectment action without joining other co-owners as parties, as the suit is deemed instituted for the benefit of all. The Court clarified the corrected ruling in Arcelona v. CA and rejected arguments that an attorney-in-fact needs authority from all co-owners or that personal signing of certification against forum shopping is required when a duly authorized representative files the case. This decision establishes important precedent on co-ownership rights and ejectment procedures.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · February 13, 2006

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.