- Petitioner
- Sps. Alfredo Mendoza
- Respondent
- Maria Coronel
- Citation
- G.R. No. 156402
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- Second Division
- Ponente
- Puno, J.
- Decided
- February 13, 2006
Summary
This case resolves the issue of whether a co-owner can file an ejectment suit without impleading other co-owners. The Supreme Court affirmed that under Article 487 of the Civil Code, any co-owner may bring an ejectment action without joining other co-owners as parties, as the suit is deemed instituted for the benefit of all. The Court clarified the corrected ruling in Arcelona v. CA and rejected arguments that an attorney-in-fact needs authority from all co-owners or that personal signing of certification against forum shopping is required when a duly authorized representative files the case. This decision establishes important precedent on co-ownership rights and ejectment procedures.
Statutes applied
Related cases
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.