Petitioner
Philippine Bank of Communications
Respondent
Elena Lim
Citation
G.R. No. 158138
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Panganiban, J.
Decided
April 12, 2005

Summary

Philippine Bank of Communications sued Elena Lim, Ramon Calderon, and Tri-Oro International Trading for P4,014,297.23 deficiency after foreclosure of a loan secured by a promissory note and surety agreement. The promissory note contained an exclusive venue stipulation for Makati City, but the bank filed suit in Manila. The Supreme Court affirmed the Court of Appeals' dismissal, applying the 'complementary-contracts-construed-together' doctrine under Article 1374 of the Civil Code. Since the surety agreement was accessory to and inseparable from the promissory note, the restrictive venue clause in the promissory note applied to both contracts. The Court emphasized that as the bank drafted both contracts of adhesion, it could not disavow its own restrictive stipulation. The case establishes important precedent on venue restrictions in interconnected loan and surety agreements.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · April 12, 2005

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.