Petitioner
Spouses Bernabe Mercader, Jr.
Respondent
Spouses Jesus Bardilas
Citation
G.R. No. 163157
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Bersamin, J.
Decided
June 27, 2016

Summary

This case involved a dispute over ownership and usage rights of a 3-meter wide road right of way between adjoining properties originally subdivided from one lot. The Mercader spouses built part of their house and fence on the right of way, leading to demands from the Bardilas spouses for payment or removal. The RTC initially ruled in favor of the Mercaders, declaring the easement extinguished. However, the Court of Appeals reversed this, recognizing the Bardilas' ownership rights as owners of the servient estate. The Supreme Court affirmed the CA decision with modification, holding that under Article 630 of the Civil Code, owners of the servient estate retain ownership of the easement portion. The Court clarified that the phrase 'with existing Right of Way' in the title was merely a boundary description, not a grant of easement rights. The decision reinforced the principle that easements do not transfer ownership of the burdened property portion to the dominant estate owner.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · June 27, 2016

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.