Petitioner
Nicolas Cepillo Cruz
Respondent
The Chinaman Co-Cuaco
Citation
G.R. No. 1633
Court
Supreme Court En Banc
Division
En Banc
Ponente
Torres, J.
Decided
April 29, 1905

Summary

This case involved a landlord-tenant dispute over a warehouse lease that expired on January 1, 1903. Nicolas Cepillo Cruz, representing the property owner, sued Co-Cuaco for recovery of the leased premises and unpaid rent after the tenant refused to vacate upon lease expiration. The lease contract contained a special provision allowing the tenant to retain 30 pesos monthly from the 60-peso rent to reimburse repair costs of 245 pesos. All three levels of courts ruled in favor of the lessor, applying Civil Code provisions on lease termination. The Supreme Court emphasized that definite lease terms end automatically without need for demand, and the tenant's claim for unreimbursed repairs was unfounded since the reimbursement should have been completed by November 1900. The decision established clear precedent on automatic lease termination and tenant obligations upon expiration of definite lease terms.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · April 29, 1905

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.