Romualdo Pagsibigan v. People · G.R. 163868

Petitioner: Romualdo Pagsibigan
Respondent: People
Citation: G.R. No. 163868
Court: Supreme Court
Division: First Division
Ponente: Carpio, J.
Decided: June 4, 2009

Summary

Pagsibigan was criminally charged with estafa for allegedly selling Hinal's property to Cabasal without authorization and keeping the P215,000 payment. The RTC acquitted him criminally, finding no proof of prior fraudulent misrepresentation, but imposed civil liability for the money received. The Court of Appeals affirmed, applying quasi-contract principles. The Supreme Court partially granted Pagsibigan's petition, upholding the civil liability but deleting the attorney's fees award for lack of proper justification. The case establishes important precedents on estafa elements requiring prior misrepresentation and the requirement for factual and legal justification in attorney's fees awards.

Statutes applied

Civil Code, Art. 2208

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Joyce v. Ardiente G.R. No. 161921
Land Bank of the Philippines v. Alfredo Ong G.R. No. 190755
Rosalina Ricafuente v. Oriental Construction G.R. No. 249306
Coca-Cola Bottlers Phils. v. Ernani Guingona Meñez G.R. No. 209906
Doris U. Sunbanun v. Aurora B. Go G.R. No. 163280
Cornelio Lampesa v. Dr. Juan de Vera, Jr. G.R. No. 155111
Rodolfo Morales v. Court of Appeals (Former Seventeenth Division) G.R. No. 117228
Far East Bank v. The Honorable Court of Appeals G.R. No. 108164

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · June 4, 2009

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.