Petitioner
Spouses Mariano S. Tanglao
Respondent
Spouses Corazon S. Parungao
Citation
G.R. No. 166913
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Sandoval-Gutierrez, J.
Decided
October 5, 2007

Summary

This case involves a double sale of real property where Spring Homes Subdivision sold the same lots to two different buyers. Spouses Parungao purchased seven lots in 1992, made improvements, and remained in possession, but Spring Homes failed to deliver titles. In 1997, Spring Homes sold two of the same lots to spouses Tanglao who obtained titles and forcibly took possession. The Supreme Court applied Article 1544 of the Civil Code governing double sales of immovable property, ruling that Tanglao were not buyers in good faith since the existing occupancy and improvements should have alerted them to adverse claims. The Court held that Parungao, being first in possession in good faith, have superior ownership rights under the principle of prius tempore, prius jure (first in time, stronger in right).

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 5, 2007

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.