Petitioner
Union Bank of the Philippines
Respondent
Alain Juniat
Citation
G.R. No. 171569
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Del Castillo, J.
Decided
August 1, 2011

Summary

Union Bank sued borrowers for unpaid loan secured by chattel mortgage over sewing machines. Nonwoven intervened claiming superior rights based on subsequent pledge agreement. Both security documents were unnotarized. RTC favored Union Bank under 'first in time' rule. Court of Appeals reversed, finding valid pledge and dacion en pago. Supreme Court reinstated RTC decision, ruling that unnotarized pledge cannot bind third parties under Article 2096 of Civil Code. No evidence supported dacion en pago claim. Case demonstrates requirements for valid security interests in movable property and their enforceability against third parties. Union Bank entitled to sale proceeds despite unnotarized chattel mortgage since primary action was collection suit with attachment.

Statutes applied

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 1, 2011

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.