Petitioner
Sps. Ester Santiago
Respondent
Aida G. Dizon
Citation
G.R. No. 172771
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Carpio-Morales, J.
Decided
January 31, 2008

Summary

Aida Dizon sought reformation of a deed of sale, claiming her P550,000 sale of property to the Santiago spouses was actually an equitable mortgage. After Monte de Piedad foreclosed her mortgaged property, Elizabeth Santiago paid P550,000 to buy it back for Dizon, who immediately sold it to petitioners for the same amount with a 3-month repurchase option at P900,000. The RTC and Court of Appeals found the transaction was an equitable mortgage based on price inadequacy and Dizon's continued possession. However, the Supreme Court reversed, holding that the presumption of equitable mortgage was rebutted by evidence showing petitioners exercised ownership rights, paid taxes, collected rentals, and that the purchase price was adequate compared to the property's assessed value of P29,850. The case established that continued possession alone does not conclusively prove equitable mortgage when other evidence demonstrates genuine sale.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · January 31, 2008

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.