Petitioner
Nm Rothschild & Sons (Australia) Limited
Respondent
Lepanto Consolidated Mining Company
Citation
G.R. No. 175799
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Leonardo-De Castro, J.
Decided
November 28, 2011

Summary

Foreign corporation challenged jurisdiction of Philippine courts over action to nullify loan and hedging contracts. The Supreme Court affirmed that courts acquired jurisdiction when the defendant voluntarily appeared by seeking affirmative relief through discovery motions, despite filing motion to dismiss for lack of jurisdiction. The Court distinguished between raising affirmative defenses (which does not constitute voluntary appearance) and seeking affirmative relief (which does). The decision clarifies that an action in personam against non-resident foreign defendant requires voluntary appearance or valid service, and that denial of motion to dismiss is generally not subject to certiorari unless there is grave abuse of discretion. The case establishes important precedent on voluntary appearance doctrine and extraterritorial service of summons on foreign corporations.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · November 28, 2011

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.