Petitioner
Alain M. Diño
Respondent
Ma. Caridad L. Diño
Citation
G.R. No. 178044
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Carpio, J.
Decided
January 19, 2011

Summary

This Supreme Court case involves a petition for declaration of nullity of marriage under Article 36 of the Family Code based on psychological incapacity. Petitioner Alain Diño sought nullity of his marriage to Ma. Caridad Diño, citing her psychological incapacity manifested through abandonment of marital obligations, infidelity, and violence. The trial court granted the petition based on expert testimony establishing respondent's incurable Narcissistic Personality Disorder and her subsequent actions of obtaining foreign divorce and remarrying. The primary issue before the Supreme Court was whether property liquidation under Article 147 of the Family Code must precede issuance of the nullity decree. The Supreme Court distinguished marriages declared void under Article 36 from those under Articles 40 and 45, ruling that Article 147 governs property relations through ordinary co-ownership rules, and that the nullity decree should issue immediately upon finality without awaiting property liquidation, which can proceed separately under Civil Code provisions.

Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding

Affirmed the declaration of nullity under Article 36 of the Family Code but modified the property ruling, holding that property relations in such void marriages are governed by co-ownership under Article 147, so the decree of absolute nullity issues upon finality without awaiting liquidation, which may proceed separately.

An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · January 19, 2011

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.