Petitioner
Capitol Wireless
Respondent
The Provincial Treasurer of Batangas
Citation
G.R. No. 180110
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Peralta, J.
Decided
May 30, 2016

Summary

Capitol Wireless challenged real property tax assessments on its submarine cable systems, claiming the cables lie entirely in international waters beyond Philippine jurisdiction. The RTC and CA dismissed the case for failure to exhaust administrative remedies and pay taxes under protest as required by the Local Government Code. The Supreme Court affirmed, ruling that the case involved factual questions requiring administrative resolution regarding the extent of cable ownership and territorial location. The Court held that submarine communication cables qualify as taxable real property under Civil Code Article 415(5) as 'machinery' serving business needs, similar to electric transmission lines. Since portions of the cables necessarily lie within Philippine territorial and municipal waters, they fall within local taxing authority. Tax exemptions previously enjoyed under legislative franchises were expressly withdrawn by the Local Government Code. The decision establishes that telecommunications infrastructure can be subject to local real property taxation and reinforces the requirement to exhaust administrative remedies in tax assessment disputes involving factual determinations.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · May 30, 2016

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.