Petitioner
Padiernos
Respondent
People
Citation
G.R. No. 181111
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Second Division
Ponente
Brion, J.
Decided
August 17, 2015

Summary

Three petitioners were charged as accessories to illegal possession of lumber under P.D. 705 for taking away a truck that had been used to transport undocumented lumber. The RTC and CA convicted them as accessories, but the Supreme Court reversed the decision. The Court ruled that since the forestry crime had already been discovered when petitioners took the truck, they could not be liable as accessories under Article 19 of the RPC, which requires acts to prevent discovery of the crime. However, the Court found them guilty of obstruction of justice under P.D. 1829 for suppressing evidence with intent to impair its availability in criminal proceedings. The case demonstrates the distinction between accessory liability and obstruction of justice, and shows how the same factual allegations can constitute different crimes depending on the timing and purpose of the acts committed.

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 17, 2015

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.