- Petitioner
- Vitarich Corporation
- Respondent
- Chona Losin
- Citation
- G.R. No. 181560
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- Second Division
- Ponente
- Mendoza, J.
- Decided
- November 15, 2010
Summary
This Supreme Court case involves a commercial dispute between Vitarich Corporation and Chona Losin over unpaid accounts for poultry meat products. Losin operated a food business and ordered products worth P921,083.10 from Vitarich through agent Rodrigo Directo, who was later terminated along with other employees without proper turnover of invoices. When Vitarich demanded payment, Losin claimed overpayment and that checks were collected by Directo. The RTC favored Vitarich, the CA reversed in favor of Losin based on agency law principles, but the Supreme Court ultimately reinstated the RTC decision with modifications. The SC applied burden of proof rules requiring debtors to prove payment, found Losin failed to present proper receipts, and reduced her liability to P222,434.96 based on specific provable transactions. The case demonstrates the importance of proper documentation in commercial transactions and the application of agency law in business relationships.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
Reinstated the RTC with modification: a debtor who cannot prove payment by official receipts remains liable, and payment by check discharges the debt only when the check is encashed (Art. 1249).
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.