Petitioner
John E.R. Reyes
Respondent
Orico Doctolero
Citation
G.R. No. 185597
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Jardeleza, J.
Decided
August 2, 2017

Summary

This case involves vicarious liability arising from a shooting incident where security guards of Grandeur Security injured two petitioners at Makati Cinema Square's parking area. The Supreme Court upheld the dismissal of claims against both the security agency (Grandeur) and the premises owner (MCS). The Court held that MCS cannot be held vicariously liable as no employer-employee relationship existed with the security guards, who were merely assigned by Grandeur under a guard services contract. Regarding Grandeur, while an employer-employee relationship existed, the Court found that Grandeur successfully overcame the presumption of negligence under Article 2180 of the Civil Code by proving through extensive testimonial and documentary evidence that it exercised due diligence in both the selection and supervision of its employees. The case establishes important precedents on vicarious liability requirements and the quantum of proof needed to overcome the presumption of employer negligence.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · August 2, 2017

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.