Petitioner
Jean Tan
Respondent
Republic
Citation
G.R. No. 193443
Court
Supreme Court
Decided
April 16, 2012

Summary

The Supreme Court denied petitioners' application for land registration through acquisitive prescription. Although the RTC initially granted the application, both the CA and SC found that petitioners failed to establish the requisite 30-year possession period under Section 14(2) of P.D. 1529. The Court emphasized that for prescription against public land to begin, the property must first be expressly declared patrimonial by the State. Since the DARCO conversion occurred only in 2000, the prescriptive period could only commence from that date, making the 2001 application premature. Additionally, the Court found that sporadic tax payments over 40 years (only 11 instances) and general testimonial evidence were insufficient to prove the required open, continuous, exclusive and notorious possession in the concept of owner.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Featured in research

In-depth Intellegal research that discusses this case.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · April 16, 2012

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.