Petitioner
Spouses Hayes Velasco
Respondent
Mariano Laigo
Citation
G.R. No. 199215
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Decided
January 16, 2019

Summary

This unlawful detainer case involved a lease dispute where lessees claimed their lease was extended until 2025 based on advance rental payments to one of the lessor's heirs. The Supreme Court ruled that while no express extension existed and the heir lacked authority to extend the lease, an implied lease was created under Civil Code Article 1670 when lessors failed to give timely notice to vacate. Since lessees continued occupying for more than 15 days after lease expiration without prior notice from lessors, an implied yearly lease commenced, giving lessees the right to remain until August 31, 2007. The Court dismissed the unlawful detainer case for lack of cause of action at the time of filing, as the implied lease was still subsisting when the complaint was filed on March 6, 2007.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · January 16, 2019

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.