Petitioner
Adelaida Tuazon
Respondent
Lydia Tuazon
Citation
G.R. No. 200115
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Decided
August 1, 2018

Summary

This Supreme Court case involves a dispute over possessory rights to public land between family members surnamed Tuazon. Petitioners filed what they claimed was an accion reivindicatoria to recover possession of Lot No. 165 from respondents who had been occupying the property since 1967. The RTC initially ruled in favor of petitioners based on previous court decisions establishing their possessory rights. However, the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court correctly characterized the action as accion publiciana since the property is public land and petitioners only hold possessory rights, not ownership. The Supreme Court applied the 10-year prescriptive period for real right of possession under Article 555 of the Civil Code, counting from respondents' adverse occupation since 1967. The Court rejected arguments that prescription was interrupted by intervening litigation, finding that prior cases involved different causes of action. The petition was denied, affirming that petitioners' possessory rights had prescribed.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · August 1, 2018

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.