- Petitioner
- Republic of the Philippines
- Respondent
- Northern Cement Corporation
- Citation
- G.R. No. 200256
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- Second Division
- Ponente
- Caguioa, J.
- Decided
- April 11, 2018
Summary
Northern Cement Corporation applied for original registration of a 58,617.96 square meter lot in Sison, Pangasinan under PD 1529, claiming ownership through a 1968 deed of sale. The RTC and CA granted the application, but the Supreme Court reversed, finding Northern Cement failed to prove the required possession by prescription under Section 14(2) of PD 1529. The Court ruled that intermittent tax payments over 32 years, testimonial conclusions without specific acts of possession, and minimal improvements (only cogon grass and unirrigated rice) were insufficient to establish open, continuous, exclusive and notorious possession in the concept of owner for the required 30-year period under Civil Code Articles 1137 and 1118. The case demonstrates the stringent evidentiary requirements for original land registration, emphasizing that actual possession and development, not mere tax declarations, are essential to prove ownership by prescription.
Intellegal Wiki · Key Holding
Reversed the CA and denied registration: sporadic tax declarations and idle land do not prove the open, continuous, exclusive and notorious possession required under Section 14(2), PD 1529 and Articles 1137 and 1118.
An editorially maintained summary of the rule this Supreme Court decision is cited for — not legal advice.