Disini v. Secretary of Justice

Summary

This Supreme Court En Banc resolution denied motions for reconsideration challenging the constitutionality of the Cybercrime Prevention Act of 2012. The consolidated cases involved multiple petitioners including journalists, bloggers, civil society groups, and lawmakers challenging various provisions of RA 10175. The Court's main February 2014 decision had struck down some provisions while upholding others, particularly Section 6 which imposes one-degree higher penalties for crimes committed using ICT. In this resolution, the Court reaffirmed Section 6's constitutionality for online libel, reasoning that substantial distinctions justify harsher penalties due to the internet's speed, reach, and anonymity enabling greater harm. Chief Justice Sereno dissented vigorously, arguing Section 6 creates unconstitutional chilling effects on free speech through doubled maximum penalties, harsher accessory penalties, disqualification from probation, and extended prescription periods. The case represents a significant constitutional law decision balancing cybercrime prevention against fundamental rights in the digital age.