Petitioner
Leticia Elizondo Eupena
Respondent
Luis G. Bobier
Citation
G.R. No. 211078
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Carandang, J.
Decided
July 8, 2020

Summary

Eupena filed unlawful detainer against Bobier claiming ownership through TCT and lease contract. Bobier defended claiming he originally purchased the property from EDC and that Eupena obtained title through pactum commissorium via a Special Power of Attorney meant as loan collateral. Lower courts initially ruled for Eupena based on lease contract estoppel. However, the Court of Appeals and Supreme Court found that the circumstances indicated Eupena illegally appropriated the property when Bobier defaulted on his loan, constituting pactum commissorium prohibited under Civil Code Article 2088. The Supreme Court ruled the lease agreement was void as it resulted from the illegal appropriation, and Eupena failed to prove a valid lessor-lessee relationship necessary for unlawful detainer. The case demonstrates protection against creditors automatically appropriating collateral property upon debtor default.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By Intellegal Editorial Board · July 8, 2020

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.