Petitioner
A. Maluenda & Co.
Respondent
Gertrudis Enriquez y Villanueva
Citation
G.R. No. 21119
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
Romualdez, J.
Decided
February 19, 1924

Summary

A. Maluenda & Co. leased commercial premises on Escolta Street from Rafael Enriquez as estate administrator, but was prevented from taking possession when Enriquez simultaneously leased the same property to Lorenzo Atienza. Although the trial court awarded P4,800 damages, the Supreme Court applied Civil Code provisions on contractual obligations and damages, holding that the proper measure was the difference between contracted rent and actual rental value obtained. The Court calculated total damages of P18,000 based on excess rents collected after the property sale to Vicente Madrigal, establishing important precedent for measuring damages in lease breach cases under Philippine civil law.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

Related research

In-depth Intellegal research on the provisions this case applies.

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · February 19, 1924

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.