- Petitioner
- Rogelio Logrosa
- Respondent
- Spouses Cleofe
- Citation
- G.R. No. 217611
- Court
- Supreme Court
- Division
- Second Division
- Ponente
- Caguioa, J.
- Decided
- March 27, 2019
Summary
This case involves a partition dispute over eight parcels of land in Tagum City, Davao del Norte. Petitioner Rogelio Logrosa sought partition of properties allegedly co-owned with respondents since 1987, based on certificates of title and a notarized deed of sale showing co-ownership. Respondents Sps. Azares opposed, claiming they were sole owners and that petitioner was merely a trustee without financial contribution. Both the RTC and CA dismissed the partition complaint, finding insufficient evidence of co-ownership. The Supreme Court reversed, emphasizing that certificates of title create an indefeasible presumption of ownership that cannot be overcome by self-serving testimony alone. The Court found respondents' delayed assertion of sole ownership (after 20+ years) inconsistent with their claim and noted that certificates of title serve as the best proof of ownership. The SC directed partition proceedings, establishing that co-owners may compel partition regardless of how they acquired their title, whether through purchase or gratuity. The decision reinforces the primacy of registered titles in establishing property ownership rights.