Petitioner
Constantino
Respondent
People
Citation
G.R. No. 225696
Court
Supreme Court
Division
Third Division
Ponente
Leonen, J.
Decided
April 8, 2019

Summary

This criminal case involved notary public Atty. Bernardo T. Constantino who was charged with falsifying a public document under Article 171(2) of the Revised Penal Code. The prosecution alleged he falsely certified that Dr. Asuncion was present as a witness during the notarization of Severino Cabrales' Last Will and Testament when Dr. Asuncion actually signed after the notarization. The RTC and CA found him guilty, but the Supreme Court reversed and acquitted him. The SC held that since Dr. Asuncion signed after notarization, there was no falsification by the notary public at the time of notarization. The Court emphasized that for a notary public to be found guilty of falsifying a notarial will, the prosecution must prove simulation of signatures to make it appear that parties participated when they did not. While acquitted criminally, the Court noted potential administrative liability for notarizing incomplete documents and referred the matter to the Office of the Bar Confidant.

Statutes applied

Related cases

Other Philippine cases on the same provisions and issues.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · April 8, 2019

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.