Petitioner
Mekatrade Asia
Respondent
Philippine Phosphate
Citation
G.R. No. 226173
Court
Supreme Court
Division
First Division
Ponente
For These Reasons, J.
Decided
October 6, 2021

Summary

This Supreme Court case addresses forum shopping in the context of foreign arbitral award enforcement. Mekatrade sought to enforce an ICC arbitral award against PPFC through Philippine courts with preliminary attachment. PPFC simultaneously filed both a motion for reconsideration with the trial court and a petition for review with the Court of Appeals, challenging the same resolution. The Supreme Court found this constituted deliberate forum shopping, as both remedies involved identical parties, facts, and relief sought - to set aside the September 3, 2015 Resolution. The Court emphasized that forum shopping degrades judicial administration and creates conflicting decisions, dismissing the CA petition and directing show cause proceedings for contempt against PPFC and its counsel.

By the Intellegal Editorial Board · October 6, 2021

Search Philippine case law on Intellegal →
AI-assisted case analysis — for research only. Verify against the official decision. A research aid, not legal advice; using this page creates no attorney-client relationship. For legal advice, consult a Philippine lawyer. Verify every holding and citation against the official decision (Supreme Court E-Library / Official Gazette) before relying on it.